PSN hacked – Network back after cyber attack and bomb threat

Sony’s PlayStation Network was back online on Monday, and the information of its 53 million users was safe, despite a weekend-long cyber attack which left PSN hacked, and a reported bomb threat by the same group which caused the diversion of a flight carrying a Sony executive, according to Reuters report.

A Twitter user with the handle @LizardSquad claimed responsibility for the attack, according to ITV’s report.

Sony summed up in a blog post, “The networks were taken offline due to a distributed denial of service attack. We have seen no evidence of any intrusion to the network and no evidence of any unauthorised access to users’ personal information.”

One of @LizardSquad’s Tweets said, “”Sony, yet another large company, but they aren’t spending the waves of cash they obtain on their customers’ (PlayStation Network) service. End the greed,”

PSN hacked – and bomb threat issued

The group’s motivation for its attack was unclear. Shack News reported that the group also aimed DDoS attacks at Blizzard’s Battle.net, Riot’s League of Legends and Grinding Gear Games’ Path of Exile.

PSN Hacked

In a series of Tweets, the group also claimed to be aiming similar attacks at Xbox Live. “We don’t comment on the root cause of a specific issue, but as you can see on Xbox.com/status, the core Xbox LIVE services are up and running,” Xbox spokesman David Dennis said in an interview with Reuters.

Vice commented, “Since Lizard Squad’s fake threat of explosives and media coverage citing it as responsible for the ‘hack,’the group has gained over 15,000 followers on Twitter. One of those followers includes Smedley himself.

Gained 15,000 Twitter followers

In a blog post timed for Cologne’s Gamescom this year, ESET Distinguished Researcher Aryeh Goretsky said, “Computer criminals don’t just target gamers: gaming companies themselves can be targeted as well.  Probably the most well-known example of this is the April 2011 breach of the Sony PlayStation Network gaming and Qriocity music streaming service, which resulted in the compromise of the names, addresses and credit card details of 77 million user accounts.

“ESET provided extensive coverage of the Sony data breach in our blog, starting from the initial report of the breach in April 2011 all the way up to the proposed settlement of a week ago.  As a result, I am not going to discuss the details of the Sony breach in this article.

“Readers should be aware that this sort of problem is not unique to Sony, either.  Almost exactly, two years ago, Blizzard Entertainment suffered a data breach themselves, although they responded in a different and — this author thinks — more responsible fashion.

The point here is that computer game companies and their associated services face real threats from criminals: if they charge customers for online play, the purchase of in-game items, or otherwise contain customer billing data in their computers, then those computers systems are targets for financial crime.”

A We Live Security guide to staying safe from cybercriminals while gaming online can be found here.

The post PSN hacked – Network back after cyber attack and bomb threat appeared first on We Live Security.

Bitcoin wallet phishing scores unlikely hit with crypto-curious

A new tactic where waves of Bitcoin wallet phishing emails are targeted at corporations has proved a success for the criminals behind it – with nearly 2.7% of victims clicking on the malicious link embedded in the two waves of 12,000 emails. Previous Bitcoin wallet phishing campaigns usually targeted known lists of Bitcoin users.

Proofpoint, which monitored the attack, said people who did not use Bitcoin wallets clicked on the emails as well as users of the cryptocurrency, which were sent in two separate waves directed at organizations across various industries.

Proofpoint said that the high success rate proved how much the hype behind the Bitcoin wallet had caught the imagination of the general population.“Unregulated and designed for anonymity, Bitcoin represents an attractive, $6.8 billion target to cyber criminals,” Proofpoint said.

Bitcoin Wallet: ‘Attractive target’

The Register’s John Leyden reported, “This high click-through rate is a concern because crooks could easily switch from Bitcoin scams to targeting curious users with DDoS malware, remote access Trojans, corporate credential phish, or other threats.”

Anti-phishing firm Cloudmark commented on The Register’s report that the relatively low volume campaign had not been effective at avoiding spam filters – and thus was likely the work of “inexperienced spammers.”

The emails took the form of fake “account warning” emails, except using the Bitcoin wallet site Blockchain instead of banks or online payment services. The warning described a failed login attempt “originating in China”. As soon as victims clicked they were directed to a fake version of the Blockchain site, which includes a Bitcoin wallet.

Unlike with many banks and credit cards, there is little protection for Bitcoin users who have had their currency stolen – hence the many, many campaigns targeted at them.

Exploiting human psychology

The phishing campaign follows a fairly straightforward “account warning” template, using the Bitcoin site Blockchain.info instead of the usual bank or online payment service names. Prospective marks were falsely warned about a failed login attempt originating in China, attempting to create a sense of urgency by capitalising on popular fears over Chinese hacking.

Kevin Epstein, vice president of Advanced Security at Proofpoint said, “Cybercriminals are continuing to improve their odds of success by exploiting human psychology as well as technology. Proofpoint’s research team recently observed a startling example of these ‘human factor’ exploit tactics in a campaign nominally targeted at stealing Bitcoin access credentials”

“People who had no Bitcoin accounts – no reason to click on the email solicitation – were clicking anyway. It seems likely that attackers were taking advantage of Bitcoin’s recent popularity in the news to engage targeted users’ curiosity.

“The implications for corporate security teams are significant. Security professionals cannot afford to ignore any phishing emails, even what initially appear to be consumer-oriented campaigns not relevant to professional end users, as such topical phish clearly compels clicks even from users who should have no reason to click.”

The post Bitcoin wallet phishing scores unlikely hit with crypto-curious appeared first on We Live Security.

SB14-237: Vulnerability Summary for the Week of August 18, 2014

Original release date: August 25, 2014

The US-CERT Cyber Security Bulletin provides a summary of new vulnerabilities that have been recorded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Vulnerability Database (NVD) in the past week. The NVD is sponsored by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC) / United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT). For modified or updated entries, please visit the NVD, which contains historical vulnerability information.

The vulnerabilities are based on the CVE vulnerability naming standard and are organized according to severity, determined by the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) standard. The division of high, medium, and low severities correspond to the following scores:

  • High – Vulnerabilities will be labeled High severity if they have a CVSS base score of 7.0 – 10.0

  • Medium – Vulnerabilities will be labeled Medium severity if they have a CVSS base score of 4.0 – 6.9

  • Low – Vulnerabilities will be labeled Low severity if they have a CVSS base score of 0.0 – 3.9

Entries may include additional information provided by organizations and efforts sponsored by US-CERT. This information may include identifying information, values, definitions, and related links. Patch information is provided when available. Please note that some of the information in the bulletins is compiled from external, open source reports and is not a direct result of US-CERT analysis.

High Vulnerabilities

Primary
Vendor — Product
Description Published CVSS Score Source & Patch Info
alienvault — open_source_security_information_management The (1) av-centerd SOAP service and (2) backup command in the ossim-framework service in AlienVault OSSIM before 4.6.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-21 10.0 CVE-2014-5158
MISC
MISC
alienvault — open_source_security_information_management SQL injection vulnerability in the ossim-framework service in AlienVault OSSIM before 4.6.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the ws_data parameter. 2014-08-21 7.5 CVE-2014-5159
MISC
alienvault — open_source_security_information_management The av-centerd SOAP service in AlienVault OSSIM before 4.7.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted (1) remote_task or (2) get_license request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3804 and CVE-2014-3805. 2014-08-21 10.0 CVE-2014-5210
MISC
MISC
BID
apache — traffic_server Unspecified vulnerability in Apache Traffic Server 4.2.1.1 and 5.x before 5.0.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, possibly related to health checks. 2014-08-22 10.0 CVE-2014-3525
SECUNIA
MLIST
bssys — rbs_bs-client Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Bank Soft Systems (BSS) RBS BS-Client 3.17.9 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) CARDS or (2) XACTION parameter. 2014-08-22 7.5 CVE-2014-4197
MISC
SECUNIA
cacti — cacti The graph settings script (graph_settings.php) in Cacti 0.8.8b and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a font size, related to the rrdtool commandline in lib/rrd.php. 2014-08-22 7.5 CVE-2014-5261
MISC
XF
BID
MLIST
MLIST
cacti — cacti SQL injection vulnerability in the graph settings script (graph_settings.php) in Cacti 0.8.8b and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-22 7.5 CVE-2014-5262
MISC
XF
BID
MLIST
MLIST
emc — documentum_d2 EMC Documentum D2 3.1 before P24, 3.1SP1 before P02, 4.0 before P11, 4.1 before P16, and 4.2 before P05 does not properly restrict tickets provided by D2GetAdminTicketMethod and D2RefreshCacheMethod, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a request for a superuser ticket. 2014-08-20 8.5 CVE-2014-2515
BUGTRAQ
emc — documentum_content_server EMC Documentum Content Server before 6.7 SP2 P16 and 7.x before 7.1 P07 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a user-created system object. 2014-08-20 8.5 CVE-2014-4618
BUGTRAQ
freereprintables — articlefr Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Free Reprintables ArticleFR 3.0.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a (1) get or (2) set action to rate.php. 2014-08-22 7.5 CVE-2014-5097
MISC
BUGTRAQ
MISC
ibm — infosphere_master_data_management IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management – Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1-FP11 and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x before 9.1-FP15 and 10.x and 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allow local users to obtain administrator privileges via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-17 7.5 CVE-2014-3063
XF
ibm — global_console_manager_16_firmware systest.php on IBM GCM16 and GCM32 Global Console Manager switches with firmware before 1.20.20.23447 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the lpres parameter. 2014-08-17 7.1 CVE-2014-3085
XF
EXPLOIT-DB
ibm — websphere_application_server IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.0.x before 8.0.0.10 and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3, when Load Balancer for IPv4 Dispatcher is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Load Balancer crash) via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-21 7.1 CVE-2014-4764
XF
AIXAPAR
iridium — open_port The Pilot Below Deck Equipment (BDE) and OpenPort implementations on Iridium satellite terminals allow remote attackers to read hardcoded credentials via the web interface. 2014-08-17 9.3 CVE-2014-0326
CERT-VN
iridium — open_port The Terminal Upgrade Tool in the Pilot Below Deck Equipment (BDE) and OpenPort implementations on Iridium satellite terminals allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading new firmware to TCP port 54321. 2014-08-17 9.3 CVE-2014-0327
kk-osk — advance-flow SQL injection vulnerability in OSK Advance-Flow 4.41 and earlier and Advance-Flow Forms 4.41 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-19 7.5 CVE-2014-3906
JVNDB
JVN
linux — linux_kernel The do_remount function in fs/namespace.c in the Linux kernel through 3.16.1 does not maintain the MNT_LOCK_READONLY bit across a remount of a bind mount, which allows local users to bypass an intended read-only restriction and defeat certain sandbox protection mechanisms via a “mount -o remount” command within a user namespace. 2014-08-18 7.2 CVE-2014-5206
MLIST
linux — linux_kernel fs/namespace.c in the Linux kernel through 3.16.1 does not properly restrict clearing MNT_NODEV, MNT_NOSUID, and MNT_NOEXEC and changing MNT_ATIME_MASK during a remount of a bind mount, which allows local users to gain privileges, interfere with backups and auditing on systems that had atime enabled, or cause a denial of service (excessive filesystem updating) on systems that had atime disabled via a “mount -o remount” command within a user namespace. 2014-08-18 7.2 CVE-2014-5207
MLIST
novell — open_enterprise_server Unspecified vulnerability in Novell Open Enterprise Server (OES) 11 SP1 before Scheduled Maintenance Update 9415 and 11 SP2 before Scheduled Maintenance Update 9413 for Linux has unknown impact and attack vectors. 2014-08-17 10.0 CVE-2014-0609
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
redhat — jboss_enterprise_application_platform RESTEasy 2.3.1 before 2.3.8.SP2 and 3.x before 3.0.9, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.3.0, does not disable external entities when the resteasy.document.expand.entity.references parameter is set to false, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and have other unspecified impact via unspecified vectors, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-0818. 2014-08-19 7.5 CVE-2014-3490
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
REDHAT
REDHAT
REDHAT
rubyonrails — ruby_on_rails activerecord/lib/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb in Active Record in Ruby on Rails 4.0.x before 4.0.9 and 4.1.x before 4.1.5 allows remote attackers to bypass the strong parameters protection mechanism via crafted input to an application that makes create_with calls. 2014-08-20 7.5 CVE-2014-3514
MLIST
MLIST
siemens — simatic_s7-1500_cpu Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU devices with firmware before 1.6 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device restart and STOP transition) via crafted TCP packets. 2014-08-17 7.1 CVE-2014-5074
tenfourzero — shutter SQL injection vulnerability in lib/admin.php in tenfourzero Shutter 0.1.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-17 7.5 CVE-2014-3904
wordpress — wordpress wp-includes/class-wp-customize-widgets.php in the widget implementation in WordPress 3.9.x before 3.9.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. 2014-08-18 7.5 CVE-2014-5203
CONFIRM
MLIST

Back to top

Medium Vulnerabilities

Primary
Vendor — Product
Description Published CVSS Score Source & Patch Info
adobe — adobe_air Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.241 and 14.x before 14.0.0.176 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.400 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 14.0.0.178 on Windows and OS X and before 14.0.0.179 on Android, Adobe AIR SDK before 14.0.0.178, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 14.0.0.178 do not properly restrict the SWF file format, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks against JSONP endpoints, and obtain sensitive information, via a crafted OBJECT element with SWF content satisfying the character-set requirements of a callback API, in conjunction with a manipulation involving a ‘$’ (dollar sign) or ‘(‘ (open parenthesis) character. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-4671. 2014-08-19 6.8 CVE-2014-5333
MISC
alienvault — open_source_security_information_management SQL injection vulnerability in AlienVault OSSIM before 4.7.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-21 6.5 CVE-2014-5383
apache — ofbiz Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in framework/common/webcommon/includes/messages.ftl in Apache OFBiz 11.04.01 before 11.04.05 and 12.04.01 before 12.04.04 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, which are not properly handled in a (1) result or (2) error message. 2014-08-22 4.3 CVE-2014-0232
XF
SECTRACK
BID
BUGTRAQ
SECUNIA
MLIST
MISC
apache — subversion The (1) serf_ssl_cert_issuer, (2) serf_ssl_cert_subject, and (3) serf_ssl_cert_certificate functions in Serf 0.2.0 through 1.3.x before 1.3.7 does not properly handle a NUL byte in a domain name in the subject’s Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority. 2014-08-19 4.0 CVE-2014-3504
CONFIRM
apache — subversion The Serf RA layer in Apache Subversion 1.4.0 through 1.7.x before 1.7.18 and 1.8.x before 1.8.10 does not properly handle wildcards in the Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. 2014-08-19 4.0 CVE-2014-3522
XF
BID
SECUNIA
apache — subversion Apache Subversion 1.0.0 through 1.7.x before 1.7.17 and 1.8.x before 1.8.10 uses an MD5 hash of the URL and authentication realm to store cached credentials, which makes it easier for remote servers to obtain the credentials via a crafted authentication realm. 2014-08-19 4.0 CVE-2014-3528
apache — httpasyncclient org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier in Apache HttpComponents HttpClient before 4.3.5 and HttpAsyncClient before 4.0.2 does not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject’s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a “CN=” string in a field in the distinguished name (DN) of a certificate, as demonstrated by the “foo,CN=www.apache.org” string in the O field. 2014-08-21 5.8 CVE-2014-3577
FULLDISC
MISC
baidu — spark_browser Stack-based buffer overflow in Baidu Spark Browser 26.5.9999.3511 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via nested calls to the window.print JavaScript function. 2014-08-19 5.0 CVE-2014-5349
MISC
EXPLOIT-DB
OSVDB
binarymoon — timthumb Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in timthumb.php in TimThumb 1.09 and earlier, as used in Mimbo Pro 2.3.1 and other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the src parameter. 2014-08-21 4.3 CVE-2009-5142
CONFIRM
OSVDB
MISC
binarymoon — timthumb Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in timthumb.php in TimThumb before 1.15 as of 20100908 (r88), as used in multiple products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the QUERY_STRING. 2014-08-21 4.3 CVE-2010-5302
CONFIRM
OSVDB
binarymoon — timthumb Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the displayError function in timthumb.php in TimThumb before 1.15 (r85), as used in multiple products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to $errorString. 2014-08-21 4.3 CVE-2010-5303
bitdefender — gravityzone Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Bitdefender GravityZone before 5.1.11.432 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a (1) .. (dot dot) in the id parameter to webservice/CORE/downloadFullKitEpc/a/1 in the Web Console or (2) %2E%2E (encoded dot dot) in the default URI to port 7074 on the Update Server. 2014-08-19 5.0 CVE-2014-5350
MISC
CONFIRM
FULLDISC
blackberry — q10 The Storage and Access service in BlackBerry OS 10.x before 10.2.1.1925 on Q5, Q10, Z10, and Z30 devices does not enforce the password requirement for SMB filesystem access, which allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary files via (1) a session over a Wi-Fi network or (2) a session over a USB connection in Development Mode. 2014-08-18 6.1 CVE-2014-2388
BUGTRAQ
MISC
MISC
cisco — asr_5000_series_software The Session Manager component in Packet Data Network Gateway (aka PGW) in Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software 11.0, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 14.0, 15.0, 16.x through 16.1.2, and 17.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via a crafted TCP packet, aka Bug ID CSCuo21914. 2014-08-20 4.3 CVE-2014-3331
cisco — webex_meetmenow Directory traversal vulnerability in an unspecified PHP script in the server in Cisco WebEx MeetMeNow allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCuo16166. 2014-08-20 4.0 CVE-2014-3340
cisco — nexus_5000 The SNMP module in Cisco NX-OS 7.0(3)N1(1) and earlier on Nexus 5000 and 6000 devices provides different error messages for invalid requests depending on whether the VLAN ID exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate VLANs via a series of requests, aka Bug ID CSCup85616. 2014-08-19 5.0 CVE-2014-3341
debian — kde4libs KDE kdelibs before 4.14 and kauth before 5.1 does not properly use D-Bus for communication with a polkit authority, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging a PolkitUnixProcess PolkitSubject race condition via a (1) setuid process or (2) pkexec process, related to CVE-2013-4288 and “PID reuse race conditions.” 2014-08-19 6.9 CVE-2014-5033
UBUNTU
DEBIAN
SECUNIA
SECUNIA
SECUNIA
CONFIRM
SUSE
disqus — disqus_comment_system Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in upgrade.php in the Disqus Comment System plugin before 2.76 for WordPress allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the step parameter. 2014-08-19 4.3 CVE-2014-5345
MISC
BID
FULLDISC
MISC
disqus — disqus_comment_system Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Disqus Comment System plugin 2.77 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) activate or (2) deactivate the plugin via the active parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php, (3) import comments via an import_comments action, or (4) export comments via an export_comments action to wp-admin/index.php. 2014-08-19 6.8 CVE-2014-5346
MISC
FULLDISC
disqus — disqus_comment_system Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Disqus Comment System plugin before 2.76 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (1) disqus_replace, (2) disqus_public_key, or (3) disqus_secret_key parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php in manage.php or that (4) reset or (5) delete plugin options via the reset parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php. 2014-08-19 6.8 CVE-2014-5347
MISC
MISC
XF
XF
BID
EXPLOIT-DB
FULLDISC
MISC
MISC
drupal — drupal The Incutio XML-RPC (IXR) Library, as used in WordPress before 3.9.2 and Drupal 6.x before 6.33 and 7.x before 7.31, permits entity declarations without considering recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted XML document containing a large number of nested entity references, a similar issue to CVE-2003-1564. 2014-08-18 5.0 CVE-2014-5265
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
drupal — drupal The Incutio XML-RPC (IXR) Library, as used in WordPress before 3.9.2 and Drupal 6.x before 6.33 and 7.x before 7.31, does not limit the number of elements in an XML document, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large document, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-5265. 2014-08-18 5.0 CVE-2014-5266
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
emc — rsa_archer_egrc EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions on resource access via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-20 4.0 CVE-2014-0640
BUGTRAQ
emc — rsa_archer_egrc Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. 2014-08-20 6.8 CVE-2014-0641
BUGTRAQ
emc — rsa_archer_egrc EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to trigger the download of arbitrary code, and consequently change the product’s functionality, via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-20 5.4 CVE-2014-2505
BUGTRAQ
emc — digital_assets_manager Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EMC Documentum WebTop before 6.7 SP1 P28 and 6.7 SP2 before P14 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) startat or (2) entryId parameter. 2014-08-20 4.3 CVE-2014-2511
BUGTRAQ
emc — rsa_archer_egrc Unspecified vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. 2014-08-20 6.5 CVE-2014-2517
BUGTRAQ
emc — digital_assets_manager Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC Documentum WDK before 6.7SP1 P28 and 6.7SP2 before P15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. 2014-08-20 6.8 CVE-2014-2518
BUGTRAQ
emc — documentum_content_server EMC Documentum Content Server before 6.7 SP2 P16 and 7.x before 7.1 P07, when Oracle Database is used, does not properly restrict DQL hints, which allows remote authenticated users to conduct DQL injection attacks and read sensitive database content via a crafted request. 2014-08-20 6.3 CVE-2014-2520
BUGTRAQ
emc — documentum_content_server EMC Documentum Content Server before 6.7 SP2 P16 and 7.x before 7.1 P07 allows remote authenticated users to read sensitive object metadata via an RPC command. 2014-08-20 6.3 CVE-2014-2521
BUGTRAQ
esri — arcgis_for_server Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ESRI ArcGIS for Server 10.1.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters. 2014-08-22 4.3 CVE-2014-5121
BUGTRAQ
esri — arcgis_for_server Open redirect vulnerability in ESRI ArcGIS for Server 10.1.1 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via an unspecified parameter, related to login. 2014-08-22 5.8 CVE-2014-5122
BUGTRAQ
fedoraproject — 389_directory_server Red Hat Directory Server 8 and 389 Directory Server, when debugging is enabled, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive replicated metadata by searching the directory. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-3562
CONFIRM
fengoffice — feng_office Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Feng Office allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a client Name field. 2014-08-19 4.3 CVE-2014-5343
XF
BID
MISC
freebsd — freebsd The HZ module in the iconv implementation in FreeBSD 10.0 before p6 and NetBSD allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via a crafted argument to the iconv_open function. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types. CVE-2014-5384 is used for the NULL pointer dereference. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-3951
SECTRACK
MLIST
freebsd — freebsd The VIQR module in the iconv implementation in FreeBSD 10.0 before p6 and NetBSD allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds array access) via a crafted argument to the iconv_open function. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2014-3951 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-5384
SECTRACK
MLIST
ibm — websphere_datapower_soa_appliance IBM WebSphere DataPower SOA appliances through 4.0.2.15, 5.x through 5.0.0.17, 6.0.0.x through 6.0.0.9, and 6.0.1.x through 6.0.1.5 make it easier for remote attackers to obtain a PreMasterSecret value and defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sending a large number of requests in an SSL/TLS side-channel timing attack. 2014-08-16 4.3 CVE-2014-0852
XF
ibm — websphere_application_server IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.x before 7.0.0.33, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.9, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted SOAP response. 2014-08-21 4.3 CVE-2014-0965
XF
AIXAPAR
ibm — infosphere_master_data_management SQL injection vulnerability in the GDS component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management – Collaborative Edition 10.x and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x through 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-17 6.5 CVE-2014-0966
XF
ibm — infosphere_master_data_management Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the GDS component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management – Collaborative Edition 10.x and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x through 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. 2014-08-17 6.8 CVE-2014-0969
XF
ibm — websphere_application_server IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.x before 7.0.0.33, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.9, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted URL that triggers an error condition. 2014-08-21 4.3 CVE-2014-3022
XF
AIXAPAR
ibm — websphere_application_server The addFileRegistryAccount Virtual Member Manager (VMM) SPI Admin Task in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.0.x before 8.0.0.10 and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 does not properly create accounts, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-3070
XF
AIXAPAR
ibm — global_console_manager_16_firmware Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities on IBM GCM16 and GCM32 Global Console Manager switches with firmware before 1.20.20.23447 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the query string to kvm.cgi or (2) the key parameter to avctalert.php. 2014-08-17 4.3 CVE-2014-3080
XF
EXPLOIT-DB
ibm — global_console_manager_16_firmware prodtest.php on IBM GCM16 and GCM32 Global Console Manager switches with firmware before 1.20.20.23447 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via the filename parameter. 2014-08-17 6.3 CVE-2014-3081
XF
EXPLOIT-DB
ibm — websphere_application_server IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.x before 7.0.0.35, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.10, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 does not properly restrict resource access, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-3083
XF
AIXAPAR
ibm — business_process_manager callService.do in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) 7.5 through 8.5.5 and WebSphere Lombardi Edition 7.2 through 7.2.0.5 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. 2014-08-17 4.0 CVE-2014-3087
XF
ibm — rational_directory_administrator The RDS Java Client library in IBM Rational Directory Server (RDS) 5.1.1.x before 5.1.1.2 iFix004 and 5.2.x before 5.2.1 iFix003, and Rational Directory Administrator (RDA) 6.0 before iFix002, includes the cleartext root password, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a library file. 2014-08-21 4.9 CVE-2014-3089
XF
ibm — powervc IBM PowerVC 1.2.0 before FixPack3 does not properly use the known_hosts file, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSH servers via an arbitrary server key. 2014-08-20 4.3 CVE-2014-4749
XF
ibm — websphere_application_server IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Liberty Profile 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 does not properly use the Liberty Repository for feature installation, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-21 6.5 CVE-2014-4767
XF
AIXAPAR
ibm — infosphere_master_data_management IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management – Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1-FP11 and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x before 9.1-FP15 and 10.x and 11.x before 11.3-IF2 do not properly protect credentials, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-17 5.0 CVE-2014-4775
XF
linecorp — line LINE 3.2.1.83 and earlier on Windows and 3.2.1 and earlier on OS X does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. 2014-08-16 4.3 CVE-2013-7144
MISC
mobiloud — mobiloud Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Mobiloud (mobiloud-mobile-app-plugin) plugin before 2.3.8 for WordPress allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. 2014-08-19 4.3 CVE-2014-5344
SECUNIA
openstack — neutron The notifier middleware in OpenStack PyCADF 0.5.0 and earlier, Telemetry (Ceilometer) 2013.2 before 2013.2.4 and 2014.x before 2014.1.2, Neutron 2014.x before 2014.1.2 and Juno before Juno-2, and Oslo allows remote authenticated users to obtain X_AUTH_TOKEN values by reading the message queue (v2/meters/http.request). 2014-08-19 5.0 CVE-2014-4615
UBUNTU
BID
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
SECUNIA
REDHAT
owncloud — owncloud Directory traversal vulnerability in the routing component in ownCloud Server before 5.0.17 and 6.0.x before 6.0.4 allows remote attackers to include and execute arbitrary local files via a .. (dot dot) in a filename, related to index.php. 2014-08-20 6.8 CVE-2014-4929
BID
MANDRIVA
CONFIRM
piwigo — piwigo Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/picture_modify.php in the photo-edit subsystem in Piwigo 2.6.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the associate[] field, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4649. 2014-08-17 4.3 CVE-2014-3900
CONFIRM
JVNDB
JVN
redhat — jboss_enterprise_application_platform The EJB invocation handler implementation in Red Hat JBossWS, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.2.0 and 6.3.0, does not properly enforce the method level restrictions for outbound messages, which allows remote authenticated users to access otherwise restricted JAX-WS handlers by leveraging permissions to the EJB class. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-2133. 2014-08-19 5.5 CVE-2014-3464
CONFIRM
redhat — jboss_enterprise_application_platform The isCallerInRole function in SimpleSecurityManager in JBoss Application Server (AS) 7, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.3.0, does not properly check caller roles, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass access restrictions via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-19 4.9 CVE-2014-3472
CONFIRM
riverbed — steelapp_traffic_manager Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in apps/zxtm/locallog.cgi in Riverbed Stingray (aka SteelApp) Traffic Manager Virtual Appliance 9.6 patchlevel 9620140312 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the logfile parameter. 2014-08-19 4.3 CVE-2014-5348
BID
FULLDISC
schrack — technik_microcontrol Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web interface in Schrack Technik microControl with firmware 1.7.0 (937) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the position textbox in the configuration menu or other unspecified vectors. 2014-08-20 4.3 CVE-2014-5382
MISC
FULLDISC
shopizer — shopizer com/salesmanager/central/profile/ProfileAction.java in Shopizer 1.1.5 and earlier does not restrict the number of authentication attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess passwords via a brute force attack. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-5385
BUGTRAQ
FULLDISC
symantec — encryption_desktop Symantec Encryption Desktop 10.3.x before 10.3.2 MP3, and Symantec PGP Desktop 10.0.x through 10.2.x, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a crafted encrypted e-mail message that decompresses to a larger size. 2014-08-21 5.0 CVE-2014-3436
BID
tenfourzero — shutter Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in tenfourzero Shutter 0.1.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-17 4.3 CVE-2014-3905
wordpress — wordpress wp-includes/pluggable.php in WordPress before 3.9.2 rejects invalid CSRF nonces with a different timing depending on which characters in the nonce are incorrect, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force attack. 2014-08-18 6.8 CVE-2014-5204
CONFIRM
MLIST
wordpress — wordpress wp-includes/pluggable.php in WordPress before 3.9.2 does not use delimiters during concatenation of action values and uid values in CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force attack. 2014-08-18 6.8 CVE-2014-5205
CONFIRM
MLIST
xml-dt_project — xml-dt The (1) mkxmltype and (2) mkdtskel scripts in XML-DT before 0.64 allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /tmp/_xml_##### temporary file. 2014-08-16 4.9 CVE-2014-5260
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
MLIST

Back to top

Low Vulnerabilities

Primary
Vendor — Product
Description Published CVSS Score Source & Patch Info
blackberry — blackberry_enterprise_service BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5.x before 5.0.4 MR7 and Enterprise Service 10.x before 10.2.2 log cleartext credentials during exception handling, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the exception log file. 2014-08-18 2.1 CVE-2014-1469
gnu — readline The _rl_tropen function in util.c in GNU readline before 6.3 patch 3 allows local users to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /var/tmp/rltrace.[PID] file. 2014-08-20 3.3 CVE-2014-2524
FEDORA
MISC
MANDRIVA
MLIST
MLIST
CONFIRM
ibm — tivoli_storage_manager Buffer overflow in the Java GUI Configuration Wizard and Preferences Editor in the backup-archive client in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) 5.x and 6.x before 6.2.5.2, 6.3.x before 6.3.2, and 6.4.x before 6.4.2 on Windows and OS X allows local users to cause a denial of service (application crash or hang) via unspecified vectors. 2014-08-17 2.1 CVE-2014-0876
XF
ibm — infosphere_biginsights IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 2.0 through 2.1.2 does not set the secure flag for the LTPA cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session. 2014-08-17 2.6 CVE-2014-0905
XF
CONFIRM
ibm — powervc IBM PowerVC Express Edition 1.2.0 before FixPack3 establishes an FTP session for transferring files to a managed IVM, which allows remote attackers to discover credentials by sniffing the network. 2014-08-20 2.9 CVE-2014-4750
XF
jayj — cakifo Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Cakifo theme 1.x before 1.6.2 for WordPress allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via crafted Exif data. 2014-08-19 3.5 CVE-2014-3903
JVNDB
JVN
openstack — horizon Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Host Aggregates interface in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) before 2013.2.4, 2014.1 before 2014.1.2, and Juno before Juno-3 allows remote administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a new host aggregate name. 2014-08-22 3.5 CVE-2014-3594
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
XF
BID
MLIST
phpmyadmin — phpmyadmin Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in phpMyAdmin 4.0.x before 4.0.10.2, 4.1.x before 4.1.14.3, and 4.2.x before 4.2.7.1 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) browse table page, related to js/sql.js; (2) ENUM editor page, related to js/functions.js; (3) monitor page, related to js/server_status_monitor.js; (4) query charts page, related to js/tbl_chart.js; or (5) table relations page, related to libraries/tbl_relation.lib.php. 2014-08-21 3.5 CVE-2014-5273
phpmyadmin — phpmyadmin Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the view operations page in phpMyAdmin 4.1.x before 4.1.14.3 and 4.2.x before 4.2.7.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted view name, related to js/functions.js. 2014-08-21 3.5 CVE-2014-5274
wordpress — wordpress Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in wp-includes/pluggable.php in WordPress before 3.9.2, when Multisite is enabled, allows remote authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML, and obtain Super Admin privileges, via a crafted avatar URL. 2014-08-18 2.1 CVE-2014-5240
CONFIRM
MLIST

Back to top

 


This product is provided subject to this Notification and this Privacy & Use policy.

How to look like an idiot on Facebook and Twitter

Looking like an idiot on social networks like Facebook and Twitter is not too difficult. Many people have achieved this state of being without much thought at all. So c’mon! With a little effort and commitment you can lose your job, get arrested, or alienate your friends! ;)

Facebook idiot

Here are the top 3 ways you can look like a total nincompoop on social media.

  1. 1. Post rants and other fun messages. Anger is a completely natural, healthy emotion. Some people think it’s a good idea to try to control it so they won’t, for example, drive their fist through the wall or punch their co-worker in the nose. But now, you can release all that pent up emotion by communicating your feelings on social media!

Like this woman: After being passed over for a promotion at work, an Arizona woman posted an angry Facebook message in reaction. How good it must have felt to let her frustration out. Since she was friends with her co-workers, they all saw it. It said,

This place is a joke!!! I wonder if I passed up a good opportunity by being at this place. I absolutely hate fake and lazy ppl!!! Ugh, the ones who actually work are the ones to blame??? WTF? #TwistedMinds.”

Those co-workers of hers, not the fake or lazy ones,  were sure to surround her with support and encouragement after reading how distressed she was.

Oh. Oops. They couldn’t encourage her. She was fired shortly after that rant.

Here’s an example of a proud daughter bragging about her father. That’s really sweet, isn’t it? Most teenagers complain about their parents, but this Florida girl took to Facebook right away to express her joy about an $80,000 age-discrimination lawsuit her father won from a former employer, a posh private school. She had plenty of classmates at the school who saw the post. She wrote,

 Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.

It’s so nice that a young girl wants to travel in Europe for the summer…all that history and culture…and the food…

Oh. Oops. The school’s administrators and lawyers also got to see her message. The lawyers were not amused, so they invoked the confidentiality order and voided her father’s settlement.

Read more on our blog about dumb things people post.

TIPS

  • Before posting, take a moment to rethink what you just entered in the newsfeed. Re-read what you wrote before hitting the publish button.
  • Take advantage of Facebook Groups or Google+ circles to make sure your messages get to the right people.
  1. 2. Let it all hang out: Ignore your privacy settings. In the excitement of daily life, it’s easy to forget how many people can read your posts. From co-workers to your mom, even strangers; virtually anyone can read your angry rant, your drunken Tweet, or see Selfies of your trip to the mall when you were supposed to be home sick in bed. When I read about this guy, I knew you’d like it too – it’s so cute.

Facebook idiot1A Florida drug dealer shared a selfie of himself in his car with a wad of cash and illegal drugs in his lap. Through the window of the car, you can plainly see a sheriff’s vehicle pulled alongside. He posted it to Facebook with a comment about how easy it was to deal drugs under cops’ noses. His friends probably got a good laugh out of that, and I’ll bet he got plenty of likes and shares.

Oh. Oops. This guy must not have heard that Facebook has privacy settings, and he apparently didn’t know that he could tweak the settings for Friends only. Since his newsfeed was set to public, that nosy Sheriff’s office was able to see the photos. They must have gotten a good laugh from it, too.

TIP:

  • Learn about Privacy settings and shortcuts on the social networks you use. This blog post will help you with Facebook, and this one with Google+.
  1. 3. Believe everything you read, and then share it!

Who doesn’t love spending a rainy afternoon watching videos of their favorite celebrities in compromising positions? Rihanna’s sex video, and that crazy Justin Bieber…what will he think of next? Filling out a little survey is no inconvenience. And if you don’t like it, there’s that famous Dislike button you can download for free. Never mind the unwanted toolbar that comes with it!

It is heartening to know that people are concerned about privacy, and many of them shared it with this notification. Too bad it was meaningless.

In response to the new Facebook guidelines I hereby declare that my copyright is attached to all of my personal details, illustrations, graphics, comics, paintings, photos and videos, etc. (as a result of the Berner Convention). For commercial use of the above my written consent is needed at all times!…

Unfortunately, sad things are also shared. This past week, 24 million people shared a video that claimed to be the last good-bye from Robin Williams. It is a fake meant to scam people out of their personal data.

// <![CDATA[
(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
// ]]>

Many avast! users were incredulous that this type of scam could still happen, and indeed, this video and others of it’s ilk are fakes. Cybercrooks use our morbid curiosity to tempt us into clicking on wall posts, videos, and links.

TIPS

  • If you see anything questionable, don’t click the link. Rather mark the post as spam or click the X to remove it. If you are interested in the subject, search for it on a major search engine and try to find it from a reliable source.
  • Get rid of unwanted games in Account settings > Manage apps.
  • If you do fall for a clever scam, don’t beat yourself up – just change your password, and maybe notify your friends because chances are good you will unknowingly spam their newsfeed.
  • Make sure you keep avast! Antivirus updated, or if you don’t have antivirus protection, get avast! Free Antivirus for your PC or Mac and avast! Mobile Security for Android devices immediately.

Thank you for using avast! Antivirus and recommending us to your friends and family. For all the latest news, fun and contest information, please follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Business owners – check out our business products.

How to protect your identity at school

Summer is in full swing, but school season is right around the corner. Young people are targeted for data theft at 35 times the rate of adults – they are considered an easy target for both digital and physical theft. You can make going back to school an easier transition by ensuring your data and devices are secure both at school and at home. Even if you’ll be using the computers provided by your school’s libraries or labs, there are plenty of steps you can take to make your data safer.

Protecting Your Devices at School

If you’re using your own desktop, laptop or smartphone, there are two things to be concerned with: Physical and information theft. There are a few things you can do to minimize the odds of both types of theft, and mitigate the damage if either does occur.

  • Minimize the target
    Don’t leave your laptop or phone unlocked and unattended, whether you’re at home or in public – these items are easily grabbed when you’re not looking. And when you take your laptop with you in public, it’s best to carry it in a bag that doesn’t advertise what’s inside; laptop sleeves or carriers let people know exactly what you’re carrying.
  • Minimize the damage
    Installing a Tracker App will help you track down your device, should it be lost or stolen. And if the files on your device are encrypted, even if someone gets access to your computer, they won’t be able to profit from your information.
  • Beef up your security
    Physical loss and thefts are not the only ways to lose information on your phone. Malware and phishing are becoming increasingly common on mobile devices, so be sure to protect yourself. To protect yourself from phishing, make sure you’re using different passwords for all your different accounts, and pick a strong password for each. Using a password manager can help make this an easier task. Once you’ve got a good password, protect it: Don’t share it with others and don’t enter your password into sites you’ve visited via links in email or IM. To protect yourself from malware, install apps only from reputable apps stores, and scan those files with an anti-malware product before installing.
  • Be cautious on public Wi-Fi
    You can never be entirely sure who’s sharing the network with you on public Wi-Fi, so be extra careful when you use public Wi-Fi, like at school or at your local coffee shop. Use VPN software so that your web traffic will all be encrypted – it’ll help keep people from electronically eavesdropping on you.

Securing Your Data When Using Communal Machines

There may be times when you may need to use the computers that are provided by the school. You really have no idea who was using that computer last, or what they were doing before you got there, so you should probably assume the worst. It’s best to act as if anything you type or see on the screen can be recorded and act accordingly:

  • Do not use public machines to log into accounts, especially accounts that store financial information (e.g., bank accounts or credit cards).
  • Avoid online shopping, as someone could get not just your login credentials, but your credit card number.
  • If for some reason you do need to log into an account on a public machine, it is essential to change any passwords you may have used, when you get back to your own machine.
  • Browse in Privacy Mode if you can – if not, be sure to clear your browser history and all cookies.

Younger people may feel that their information is of lesser value than more established adults, because they may have smaller bank accounts or less-juicy data, and may not take security as seriously. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how young you are – your data and identity are valuable to cybercriminals and correcting the problems caused by loss and theft is a pain, no matter your age. Protecting your data now will help you avoid those headaches.

The post How to protect your identity at school appeared first on We Live Security.

Backoff Point-of-Sale Malware Campaign

Original release date: August 22, 2014

US-CERT is aware of Backoff malware compromising a significant number of major enterprise networks as well as small and medium businesses.

US-CERT encourages administrators and operators of Point-of-Sale systems to review the Backoff malware alert to help determine if your network may be affected.

Organizations that believe they have been infected with Backoff are also encouraged to contact their local US Secret Service Field Office.


This product is provided subject to this Notification and this Privacy & Use policy.

Week in security: Nuclear attack, scareware back and traffic-light hack

This week in security news saw two of the scariest targets for hacks ever – nuclear plants and city-wide traffic systems. The stories delivered the goods, too — the traffic-light hack could basically have been carried out by anyone, and paralyze any one of 40 American cities, and America’s  Nuclear Regulatory Commission was successfully attacked three times within the past three years, by unknown attackers, some foreign – and largely using standard phishing emails and similar techniques. It is still unknown who the attackers were.

In terms of novel malware, it was a bit of a dry week (always a good thing) bar the return of scareware  – this time armed with an even more annoying method of making you pay up.

In Cologne, gamers gathered for Gamescom – and ESET’s Aryeh Goretsky took a look at how gaming has evolved, and cybercrime along with it, with discussions of gold-farming, theft of virtual goods, and how gaming companies are now fully awake to the threat of cybercrime.

Hackers get a “green” for go!

Often, when one reads a paper behind a cybercrime story, it’s disappointing – not so in the case of the novel attack against city-wide traffic systems described by University of Michigan researchers, which is genuinely terrifying. Little skill was required – radios are unencrypted, or used default passwords, and control units had known vulnerabilities.

An attacker, like the film’s ‘crew’ on robbery, could control a series of lights to give himself passage through intersections, and then turn them red to slow emergency vehicles in pursuit, according to the BBC’s report.

The researchers at the University of Michigan, who say that networked traffic systems are left vulnerable by unencrypted radio signals and factory-default passwords, and that access to individual lights – or even a city-wide attack, as in the film, is possible, according to Time’s report.

“This paper shows that these types of systems often have safety in mind but may forget the importance of security,” the researchers write. Technology Review points out that Michigan’s system, which networks 100 lights, is far from unique. Similar systems are used in 40 states.

Scareware II: The return

Over the past months, ‘scareware’ – windows that warn users that their machine is infected, then, ironically, persuade them to download malware – has dropped, says Microsoft, as users wise up.

But a new variant, Win32/Defru has a different and simpler approach on how to trick the user and monetize on it. Basically, it prevents the user from using the internet – it displays warning windows instead of sites. Now that really is cruel.

The malware targets 300 websites, and when a user tries to access them, they instead see the following fake message, ““Detected on your computer malicious software that blocks access to certain Internet resources, in order to protect your authentication data from intruders the defender system Windows Security ® was forced to intervene.”

Rogue AV is still found – indeed ESET has been repeatedly ‘honored’ with fake scareware versions of  of its products such as when ESET researchers discovered a Trojan packaged to look like antimalware products,  – but Microsoft reports that in the past 12 months, scareware had fallen out of fashion.

Microsoft researcher Daniel Chipiristeanu says, “Lately we’re seeing a dropping trend in the telemetry for some of the once most-prevalent rogue families,  It’s likely this has happened due to the anti-malware industry’s intense targeting of these rogues in our products, and better end-user awareness and security practices.”

Chipiristeanu says that “education” has played a part – but new gangs have simply moved on to new methods to target victims.

Pay for privacy? Yes we would!

Silent Circle, makers of Blackphone, are not smarting overly from their handset’s humiliation, it seems – and their mission to stop everyone spying on us continues. They have support, it seems - a poll of 2,000 people found that almost all of us believe we are being spied on, and about a third would pay to stop it.

Privacy issues have become an increasing concern outside the security community – in part thanks to revelations of government surveillance, as discussed by ESET researcher Stephen Cobb. Silent Circle carried out the survey in May this year, via OnePoll and found that 88% of UK workers believe their calls and texts are being listened to, versus 72% of Germans – it’s not clear by whom.

Nearly a third – 31% – of Germans would pay for a service which guaranteed their texts and calls were not being listened to. In Britain, 21% would do so. Germany is traditionally more privacy-conscious – services such as Google StreetView are not permitted there.

The scandal over Facebook’s Messenger app – and the overstated responses of many media outlets, served to highlight this. Cosmopolitan writes, “Basically, it can control your whole phone. And, most scarily of all, CALL PEOPLE.” Cosmopolitan had not been previously known for its concern with online privacy.

Nuclear Armageddon: Virtually here

A report released by America’s Nuclear Regulatory Commission highlighted how depressingly ordinary cyber attacks can still be effective against even the highest value targets.

The spear-phishing attacks against the Nuclear authority were hardly hacker whizkid territory, but nonetheless, hundreds fell for them.

CNET reports that one incident led 215 employees of the nuclear agency to “a logon-credential harvesting attempt,” hosted on “a cloud-based Google spreadsheet.” The information was obtained through a specific request by NextGov. A second spearphishing attack targeted specific employees with emails crafted to dupe them into clicking a link which led to malware on Microsoft’s cloud storage site SkyDrive.

The third attack was a spearphishing attack directed at a specific employee. Once his account credentials were obtained, emails were sent to 15 further employees, with malware-laced PDFs.

“It’s still unclear which country originated the attacks, and whether the attackers were acting independently or as a part of a larger state action.

NRC spokesman David McIntyre said that his security team “thwarts” most such attempts.

Conspiracy theorists, start your engines!

Our last story really is the stuff of conspiracy theorist’s dreams: the very next day after Malaysia Airlines Flightt MH370 disappeared, “sophisticated” malware was used to steal documents from government officials working the case.

A mysterious attacker in China purloined “classified documents” in “significant amounts”, details of which remained vague – stoking the fires of conspiracy still further.

The Malaysian Star claims that the attack targeted officials with a PDF document which appeared to be a news report about Flight MH370, and was sent to a group of investigators. Around 30 computers were infected by the malware.

“We received reports from the administrators of the agencies telling us that their network was congested with e-mail going out of their servers,” CyberSecurity Malaysia chief exec Dr Amirudin Abdul Wahab said.

“Those e-mail contained confidential data from the officials’ computers, including the minutes of meetings and classified documents. Some of these were related to the Flight MH370 investigation.”

Business Insider says that the attack occurred one day after the Boeing 777 went missing, and took the form of an .exe file disguised as a PDF (a common office file format).

It’s unclear who the attacker – or attackers – were, but information from infected computers was transmitted to an IP address in China. Officials in Malaysia blocked the transmission, The Star said.

 

The post Week in security: Nuclear attack, scareware back and traffic-light hack appeared first on We Live Security.

Facebook scams – the ‘classics’ and how to avoid them

Facebook has changed hugely over the years – remember ‘Pokes’? – and today’s sharing machine, with its videos, its news and its scams,  is very different from the bare site Mark Zuckerberg launched.

Naturally, each new ‘feature’ has also brought new privacy worries – and security-conscious users should revisit their profile with our detailed guide to ‘maxing’ privacy on Facebook.

But some things haven’t changed – namely, the Facebook scams. It’s not that cybercriminals are unoriginal – it’s just that there are a few Facebook scams which work again and again, and all the criminals need to do is vary them slightly to keep money rolling in.

ESET Senior Research Fellow David Harley says, “While hoaxes may not seem the most dangerous aspect of online life, the migration of old hoaxes and new variations from email to social media does have some serious implications, as people Like and Share links without checking because they seem to come from likeminded and trusted friends.”

“The more FB friends you have, the more you’ll see these reverberate. You may not worry about political propaganda, but medical hoaxes and semi-scams can be a literal threat to health. “

ESET’s Social Media Scanner offers a quick, free way to check out if that news story on Facebook is true – or a scam. It never hurts to be cautious, though – and here are five classic scammy and spammy posts you should NEVER click.

Facebook scams‘Help, I’ve been mugged abroad’

Your friend or family member has lost their phone – so it makes sense they’d contact you via Facebook for help. Usually the story goes that they have been mugged or are in hospital – but it’s one of THE classic online scams, and one of the common uses cybervillains put hijacked Facebook accounts to. ESET’s Harley offers detailed tips on spotting the scam – known as ‘Londoning’,  due to early versions being used on Americans. Harley quotes a typical text: “I hope you get this on time, I made a trip to Manila(Philippines) and had my bag stolen from me with my passport and personal effects therein. The embassy has just issued me a temporary passport but I have to pay for a ticket and settle my hotel bills with the Manager.”

“I have made contact with my bank but it would take me 3-5 working days to access funds in my account, the bad news is my flight will be leaving very soon but i am having problems settling the hotel bills and the hotel manager won’t let me leave until i settle the bills, I need your help/LOAN financially and I promise to make the refund once i get back home, you are my last resort and hope, Please let me know if i can count on you and i need you to keep checking your email because it’s the only way i can reach you.”

Naturally, people worry – but it’s not your friend. Someone has hijacked their account. Harley offers five steps to take in a post here – starting with “Be suspicious” and “Verify.”

Facebook scams‘See who has been looking at your Facebook profile’

Facebook will NEVER introduce a feature that allows people to see who has looked at their profile – with the number of people who surreptitiously look up old (or potential new) flames it would probably cause World War III.

Beware – it’s a classic scam post, along with variations on real new Facebook features, or fake ones such as turning your profile pink (another bizarrely long-lived scam).

Links offering early access to features such as Facebook’s A Look Back video, or upgrades to Timeline can also be scams, as reported here. The key warning sign is that you are directed outside Facebook – look at the URL.

If Facebook was ‘upgrading’ you, it would do so within Facebook. As soon as you see an external site URL, close the window – and do not install any app. In many cases, scam videos will install a ‘rogue’ Facebook app to spread rapidly via the network – but as reported by We Live Security here, such scams can, in the worst case scenario, lead to tainted sites which infect users with PC malware.

If I get a million Likes….

What’s the harm in “Liking” a page if it’ll get his girlfriend to marry him? Not a huge amount – but you’re still helping scammers earn money. Campaigns such as privacy drives, or “Click This if You Hate Cancer” are also usually just as fake (ESET Senior Research Fellow David Harley offers tips and thoughts on these “chain letters” of Facebook)  – as are pictures where you’re urged to click and see what happens. Likes, of course, are the “currency” of Facebook – so criminals collect them by any means, air or foul. Daylan Pearce, a search-engine expert at Next Digital in Melbourne says pages with 100,000 likes can be sold for $200, according to adverts unearthed by Pearce.

‘Within 3 days a post like this one has 70,000 likes, and someone somewhere is about to make a nice little profit by selling the page to a business wanting some quick wins. The buyer then changes the page details.Instant fanpage with a big following, lots of likes.”

Your “Likes” also remain visible forever – and could serve adverts to your friends. Any pages you have “Liked” are also now searchable in Facebook’s new Graph Search. Visit your Activity Log and make sure you haven’t “Liked” any companies, products or sites you wouldn’t want the world to know about.

The warning from Facebook

“WARNING : Your account is reported to have violated the policies that are considered annoying or insulting Facebook users.system will disable your account within 24 hours if you do not do the reconfirmation.” The fake warning, is of course, a tool as fundamental to scammers as lockpicks are to burglars – witness this report just this week. Some of the bad English in that particular post should alert you to the fact that this is not a communication from Facebook – but it’s good enough to fool you if you’re not fully alert.
It’s a scam and a particularly vicious one at that.

Identified by Facecrooks.com – a great site to stay up to speed with the latest scams – the ‘warning’ scam is easier to fall for because Facebook does block certain posts or behavior – but the warning sign here is that a genuine reprimand would NEVER ask for your password. Why would Facebook need it at that point? Facecrooks writes, “if a user submits their Facebook login credentials, then the scammer will have complete control over their account. They can access their personal information to try and steal their identity, they can send bogus messages to their friends stating that they are in trouble and please send money, they can send links to other scams to all of the victim’s Facebook friends….the opportunities for misuse and exploitation are endless! Similar scareware posts involve Facebook purging drug-related posts – again, a scam.

Facebook scamsThe morbid celebrity-death story

News stories DO spread through Facebook – but so do fakes, or hybrids where a real story is changed to offer one morbid detail. Last week, a video purported to offer a video of Robin Williams making his last phone call, should ring alarm bells – few news sources would play such a video so soon after someone’s death. The scam, which you may see shared by your Facebook friends oblivious to the fact that they are helping fraudsters earn money, claims to be a ghoulish video of Robin Williams making his last phone call before committing suicide earlier this week. Of course, you might be fooled into believing it is genuine. After all, you have just seen one of your Facebook friends share it on their wall.

Multiple scams – including some using fake Facebook profiles – targeted grieving victims of the recent Flight Mh17 tragedy. Alistair MacGibbon of the University of Canberra said that the criminals would hope to make money for referring victims to unscrupulous sites – and that the practice was increasingly common. “Crooks are super-fast these days at picking up on anything that’s remotely topical, and working out how to monetize it from a criminal point of view,” he said. “It’s a really distasteful trend.”.

The too-good-to-be-true ticket offer

Cybercriminals follow the news avidly – hoping to fool users into clicking on malicious links in fake news stories – but the low-hanging fruit is upcoming events. Whether it’s the World Cup or a big concert, people  DO want tickets – and worst of all, some companies offer them through Facebook competitions, which makes the scam more convincing. A recent tickets scam encouraged fans to forward the link to friends to win Rolling Stones tickets. “You’d be making a big mistake if you clicked on the link, as you will be taken to a third-party website which strongly encourages you to share the link via social media, and then coerce others into clicking on it,” writes We Live Security’s Cluley. It is often safer to Google the subject of a link or type a website’s main URL into a browser instead of clicking the link – here, fans would have found that, on the official Stones website, there was no mention of the offer at all.

 

The post Facebook scams – the ‘classics’ and how to avoid them appeared first on We Live Security.

Secret app takes mere minutes to hack, revealing anyone’s secret via simple vulnerability

Do you trust the internet with your secrets?

Perhaps you shouldn’t, even if you’re using an app which professes to “deliver anonymously” secrets to your friends, and their circles, without identifying you as the owner of those secrets.

As Wired reports, researchers at Seattle-based Rhino Security Labs discovered a weakness in how the popular Secret app works, giving them a way of reading anybody’s supposedly anonymous postings.

At this point you’re probably imagining that for anyone to hack Secret, a popular app amongst iOS and Android users, would take ninja-like skills and advanced methods.

But in truth researchers found it remarkably easy, and the secrets of users can spill out within just a matter of minutes, as a Rhino Security researcher demonstrated to journalist Kevin Poulsen over lunch:

<blockquote style=”margin: 15px;padding: 15px 15px 5px;border-left: 5px solid #ccc;font-size: 13px;
font-style: normal;font-family: ‘Helvetica Neue’, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height: 19px;”>

White hat hacker Ben Caudill is halfway through his sandwich when he casually reaches over to his iPhone, swipes the screen a few times, then holds it up to me. “Is that you?” he asks.

It is, but nobody was supposed to know. He’s showing me one of my posts to Secret, the popular anonymous sharing app that lets you confess your darkest secrets to your friends without anyone knowing it’s you. A few minutes ago I gave Caudill my personal e-mail address, and that was all he needed to discover my secret in the middle of a Palo Alto diner, while eating a BLT.

So just how did researchers manage to connect users’ email addresses with secrets they had posted via the Secret app?

Well, it’s breathtakingly simple.

Secret posts

When you create an account on Secret, the app requests access to your address book – so it can identify friends who might also be using the service.

And, as Secret’s FAQ explains, you need at least seven friends before the app will begin to say that a secret has been posted by one of your friends (although, of course, it doesn’t identify which one).

Part of Secret FAQ

<blockquote style=”margin: 15px;padding: 15px 15px 5px;border-left: 5px solid #ccc;font-size: 13px;
font-style: normal;font-family: ‘Helvetica Neue’, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height: 19px;”>

Until you have 7 friends, posts will not be identified as coming from “friends” or “friends of friends” but will instead indicate “Your Circle.” We’ll never explicitly tell you which of your friends are on Secret to protect identities.

Does that sound reasonable to you?

Well, maybe this will make you think again.

Because what the researchers then did was create seven bogus Secret accounts – something that’s remarkably easy to do as Secret doesn’t require you to confirm your phone number or email address.

And then came the really clever part, as Kevin Poulsen of Wired explains:

<blockquote style=”margin: 15px;padding: 15px 15px 5px;border-left: 5px solid #ccc;font-size: 13px;
font-style: normal;font-family: ‘Helvetica Neue’, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height: 19px;”>

Next, [Caudill] deleted everything from his iPhone’s contact list, and added the seven fake e-mail addresses as contacts. When he was done, he added one more contact: the e-mail address of the person whose secrets he wanted to unmask — me.

Then he signed up for another new Secret account and synced his contacts. He now had a new, blank Secret feed that followed eight accounts: seven bot accounts created and controlled by him, and mine. Anything that appeared as posted by a “friend” logically belonged to me.

Clever, huh? And, in retrospect, remarkably straightforward.

So all that was required to find out what secrets you had posted was your email address – something that, for most of us, cannot really be considered private or secret.

Secret CEO David Byttow told Wired that the vulnerability has now been closed, and claimed that they had no evidence that the privacy hole had been maliciously exploited.

<blockquote style=”margin: 15px;padding: 15px 15px 5px;border-left: 5px solid #ccc;font-size: 13px;
font-style: normal;font-family: ‘Helvetica Neue’, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height: 19px;”>

“As near as we can tell this hasn’t been exploited in any meaningful way. But we have to take action to determine that.”

However, it’s worth bearing in mind that an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because Secret can’t tell if the flaw has been excused to embarrass or blackmail individuals who have posted compromising secrets, doesn’t mean that it hasn’t happened.

Secret appAnd the Secret app’s developers have confirmed that since a bug bounty was introduced in February, a total of 42 security holes have been identified and fixed.

Obviously it’s good that security and privacy vulnerabilities are being fixed, but when it’s your *secrets* which are at stake, wouldn’t you feel happier knowing that the app had been built on more sturdy ground in the first place?

One has to wonder whether Secret’s claims of “refined algorithms” to detect bots and suspicious activity on Secret are really enough to protect its users.

Secret is no stranger to controversy, of course.

Just this week a Brazilian judge has called for the app to be banned from official app stores, claiming that it encourages anonymous bullying.

But, in my mind, the problems lies not so much with the app but with the people who use it.

They clearly haven’t learnt the most basic rules of keeping secrets.

Don’t tell anyone. Don’t write it down. Don’t type it into an app. Never ever post it onto the internet.

As soon as you trust anyone or anything else with a secret, you’re doomed.

The post Secret app takes mere minutes to hack, revealing anyone’s secret via simple vulnerability appeared first on We Live Security.