Researchers shows intercepting HTTPS traffic is nothing to sneeze at as it usually lowers user security. Makes you wonder why so many security companies do it. Avira does not.
The latest version of Firefox expands non-secure HTTP warnings, enables SHA-1 deprecation by default, and removes support for NPAPI.
This week HTTPS hit a huge milestone. According to a two-week survey of telemetry data from the Mozilla Firefox browser, 50 percent of page loads used HTTPS.
Certificate authority Let’s Encrypt is celebrating a major milestone in the young nonprofit’s existence issuing its 5 millionth certificate this month.
One championship, 24 teams, and millions of smartphones. The action’s not on the field. It’s in your hands.
The post Don’t let the bad guys score: Get your defenses ready appeared first on Avira Blog.
Earlier this year, Facebook came across a bunch of duplicate SSL certificates for some of its own domains and revoked them immediately with the help of its own Certificate Transparency Monitoring Tool service.
Digital certificates are the backbone of our secure Internet, which protects sensitive information and communication, as well as authenticate systems and Internet users.
Internet users with basic security knowledge are aware that they should look for the padlock icon in the address bar or the HTTPS in a web address to indicate that a website is secure. We have gotten used to seeing it on bank sites or shopping carts where we input our credit card information. More and more, regular websites are making the switch from unencrypted HTTP to encrypted HTTPS. Last year, search giant Google sweetened the pot by adding HTTPS to their ranking algorithm. That action encouraged webmasters everywhere to make the switch to HTTPS.
The simple answer is not always. As more and more online services are moving to HTTPS, attacks are increasing. An encrypted connection ensures that the connection cannot be modified by anyone else, but it does not guarantee that the actual content being downloaded is safe. Just as with plain HTTP, if a legitimate website is hacked, malware scripts and binaries can be placed into the HTTPS page that appears to be safe.
That’s why it is imperative for security software to check this attack vector. To address this, Avast’s trusted Web Shield technology scans HTTPS sites for malware and threats.
Avast is able to detect and decrypt TLS/SSL protected traffic in our Web-content filtering component. To detect malware and threats on HTTPS sites, Avast must remove the SSL certificate and add its self-generated certificate. Our certificates are digitally signed by Avast’s trusted root authority and added into the root certificate store in Windows and in major browsers to protect against threats coming over HTTPS; traffic that otherwise could not be detected.
Avast whitelists websites if we learn that they don’t accept our certificate. Users can also whitelist sites manually, so that the HTTPS scanning does not slow access to the site.
This video gives you an overview, but if any of this didn‘t make much sense to you, read below for a more detailed explanation. You can also explore the FAQ about HTTPS scanning in Web Shield.
HyperText Transfer Protocol or HTTP is the network protocol used to deliver virtually all files and other data on the World Wide Web. When you visit a website you may see the HTTP:// prefix in the address. This means your browser is now connected to the server using HTTP. The problem with HTTP is that it is not a secure way to establish a connection, opening a door to cybercrooks who want to eavesdrop on your activities.
Hackers can eavesdrop via an HTTP address because when you connect to a website with HTTP, your browser assumes it is connected to the correct web server. The problem with this is that there is no way to authenticate that you are actually connected to the correct website. This is a big problem if you think you are connecting to your bank’s website, but you are really on a compromised network and have been redirected to a fake website. This is when the hacker can eavesdrop and see any passwords, credit cards, or other data.
HTTPS, which literally stands for HTTP Secure, is the safe encrypted counterpart to HTTP. When you connect with HTTPS , it provides identity verification and security, so you get the benefit of encryption that prevents others from eavesdropping on your communications and ensures you that you are connected to the intended server.
HTTPS encryption and authentication are provided by security protocols known as TLS and SSL. The SSL protocol verifies that you are connected to the intended server with a “handshake” which proves the identity of the server to the client. This is achieved using SSL security certificates, which contain various pieces of information like the name of the holder, the domain, validity date, the certificate’s public key, and the digital signature.
Usually the certificate is digitally signed by a trusted certificate authority (CA) that it already knows. For the connection to succeed, the server, and in some cases the client, must provide a certificate that allows the computer to determine if the connection should be trusted or not. If the private key to the certificate is leaked, anyone can mimic the server’s identity.
When the browser is about to make a connection to a HTTPS server, Avast Web Shield takes over the handshake and connects itself to the server. When the server sends its certificates, Web Shield verifies them against the Windows System Certificate Store – the same list of trusted certificates that Internet Explorer, Chrome, Opera, and other programs use. Web Shield scans the flow of the data connection, and after verifying that the communication is secure, hands over the connection to the browser.
What is a MITM attack and how does it differ from what Avast is doing?
The SSL protocol is imperfect, so hackers can take advantage of it. A man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack takes place when a hacker intercepts the communication between two systems by impersonating the two parties. This clever ruse makes them think that they are talking to each other when they are both actually talking to the attacker. The attacker can read, insert, or modify the data in the intercepted communication and no one ever knows.
The Avast WebShield must use a MITM approach in order to scan secure traffic, but the important difference is that the “middle man” we use is located in the same computer as the browser and uses the same connection. Since Avast is running with Administrator rights and elevated trust on the computer, it can create and store certificates that the browser correctly accepts and trusts for this, and only this, machine. For every original certificate, Avast makes a copy and signs it with Avast’s root certificate, located in the Windows Certificate store. This special certificate is called “Avast Web/Mail certificate root” to clearly distinguish who created it and for what purpose.
We want to emphasize that no one else has the same unique key that you have from the installation generated certificate. This certificate never leaves the computer and is never transmitted over the internet. The Windows System Certificate Store is the only place where your computer’s certificate is stored and accessed.
Our customers’ privacy was our first concern when planning the implementation of HTTPS scanning. That’s why we created a way for whitelisting, or ignoring, the connection when Avast users access banking sites. Our current list has over 600 banks from all over the world and we are constantly adding new, verified banking sites. You can, and should, verify the bank’s security certificate when using online banking sites. Once verified, you can submit the banking or other web site to our whitelist by sending us an email: banks‑[email protected]
If you do not want Avast to scan HTTPS traffic, you have the option of disabling the feature in the Avast settings:
1. Open the Avast user interface → select Settings.
2. Select Active protection → click Customize next to Web Shield.
3. Select Main settings → check/uncheck Enable HTTPS scanning to turn this feature on/off.
The use of open, unprotected Wi-Fi networks has become increasingly popular across the globe. Whether you’re traveling around a new city and rely on public Wi-Fi networks to get around or you’re at your favorite coffee shop and connect to its Wi-Fi, you’re left in a vulnerable situation when it comes to protecting your data. Just as you lock the door of your house when you leave, you should also use a security app if using public Wi-Fi.
Avast’s hack experiment examines browsing habits of people across the globe
The Avast team recently undertook a global hacking experiment, where our mobile security experts traveled to cities in the United States, Europe, and Asia to observe the public Wi-Fi activity in nine major metropolitan areas. Our experiment revealed that most mobile users aren’t taking adequate steps to protect their data and privacy from cybercriminals. In the U.S., the Avast mobile experts visited Chicago, New York, and San Francisco; in Europe, they visited Barcelona, Berlin, and London; and in Asia, they traveled to Hong Kong, Seoul, and Taipei. Each of our experts was equipped with a laptop and a Wi-Fi adapter with the ability to monitor the Wi-Fi traffic in the area. For this purpose, we developed a proprietary app, monitoring the wireless traffic at 2.4 GHz frequency. It’s important to mention that there are commercial Wi-Fi monitoring apps like this available in the market that are easy-to-use, and available for free.
The study revealed that users in Asia are the most prone to attacks. Users in San Francisco and Barcelona were most likely to take steps to protect their browsing, and users in Europe were also conscious about using secure connections. While mobile users in Asia were most likely to join open networks, Europeans and Americans were slightly less so; in Seoul, 99 out of 100 users joined unsecured networks, compared with just 80 out of 100 in Barcelona.
1) Seoul: 99 out of 100
2) Hong Kong: 98 out of 100
3) Taipei: 97 out of 100
4) Chicago: 96 out of 100
5) New York: 91 out of 100
6) Berlin: 88 out of 100
7) London: 83 out of 100
8) Barcelona: 80 out of 100
9) San Francisco: 80 out of 100
Our experiment shed light on the fact that a significant portion of mobile users browse primarily on unsecured HTTP sites. Ninety-seven percent of users in Asia connect to open, unprotected Wi-Fi networks. Seven out of ten password-protected routers use weak encryption methods, making it simple for them to be hacked. Nearly one half of the web traffic in Asia takes place on unprotected HTTP sites, compared with one third U.S. traffic and roughly one quarter of European traffic. This can most likely be attributed to the fact that there are more websites in Europe and the U.S. that use the HTTPS protocol than in Asia.
So, how much of your browsing activity can actually be monitored?
Because HTTP traffic is unprotected, our team was able to view all of the users’ browsing activity, including domain and page history, searches, personal log in information, videos, emails, and comments. Before the start of any communication, there is always a communication with the domain name server (DNS). This communication is not encrypted in most cases, so on open Wi-Fi it is possible for anybody to see which domains a user visits. This means, for example, that somebody who browses products on eBay or Amazon and is not logged in can be followed around. Also, it is visible if people read articles on nytimes.com or CNN.com, and users who perform searches on Bing.com, or who visit certain adult video streaming sites can be monitored.
Beware of weak encryption
The majority of Wi-Fi hotspots were protected, but we found that often their encryption methods were weak and could be easily hacked. Using WEP encryption can be nearly as risky as forgoing password-protection altogether, as users tend to feel safer entering their personal information, but their data can still be accessed.
San Francisco and Berlin had the lowest percentage of weakly encrypted hotspots, while more than half of password-protected hotspots in London and New York and nearly three quarter of the Asian hotspots were vulnerable to attack.
1) Seoul: 70.1%
2) Taipei: 70.0%
3) Hong Kong: 68.5%
4) London: 54.5%
5) New York: 54.4%
6) Chicago: 45.9%
7) Barcelona: 39.5%
8) Berlin: 35.1%
9) San Francisco: 30.1%
Our goal is not to discourage you from visiting HTTP sites, but instead, encourage you to protect yourself on public Wi-Fi. If you install protection that allows a secure Internet connection while accessing public networks, public Wi-Fi is harmless. But when you go unprotected, hackers can follow your way around the Internet. Even if the user accesses a HTTPS site, the domain visited is still visible to hackers.