Tag Archives: Pew

Time to Hang Up? Parents Should Look into Latest Smartphone Studies

Our children are spending more and more time with smartphones, and with good reason. They give parents a line of contact, and give kids access to loads of great games and apps.

But a recent study from the London School of Economics suggests that you may want to limit or delay your child’s access to smartphones. It shows a clear link from schools that ban students from carrying phones to an improvement in their test scores.

So what’s the gist of the study? It turns out that having a smartphone – or barring one—has a real and measurable impact on education.

“We found the impact of banning phones for these students equivalent to an additional hour a week in school, or to increasing the school year by five days,” researchers Richard Murphy and Louis-Philippe Beland stated. The study, released this May, is called Ill Communication: Technology, Distraction & Student Performance. It also found that following a ban on phone use, the schools’ test scores improved by 6.4%. The impact on underachieving students was much more significant — their average test scores rose by 14%.  The results noted that they could focus regardless of the presence of a smartphone.

The authors looked at how phone policies at 91 schools in England have changed since 2001, and compared that data with results achieved in national exams taken at the age of 16. The study covered 130,000 pupils. (See link to the full study here.)

It’s an interesting conundrum. Many of us think that technology is a driving force for improvement and development. I think that having the great wealth of education on the Internet can only be a boon. But the authors of the study draw awareness to the contrast. “Technological advancements are commonly viewed as leading to increased productivity. Numerous studies document the benefits of technology on productivity in the workplace and on human capital accumulation. There are, however, potential drawbacks to new technologies, as they may provide distractions and reduce productivity.”

Here in the US, these new studies may change a few minds and tilt a few policies. For example, Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City just revoked a decades old ban on cell phones, leaving it up to individual principals, in consultation with parents and teachers. I wonder now if he might re-think his decision?

Other research underscores the concerns raised. A major educational study by the Pew Research Institute  found 87% of teachers surveyed said that Internet and digital devices are creating an “easily distracted generation with short attention spans” and 64% said today’s digital technologies “do more to distract students than to help them academically.”

The crux of the matter is this: Kids are using their phones to text and chat when they should be paying attention in class and interacting with others personally and not digitally.

Meanwhile, yet another recent study outlines additional risks of smartphone behavior: They don’t allow us to think for ourselves.

A study from researchers at the University of Waterloo (Canada) published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior, says that “Smartphone users who are intuitive thinkers — more prone to relying on gut feelings and instincts when making decisions — frequently use their device’s search engine rather than their own brainpower. Smartphones allow them to be even lazier than they would otherwise be.”

“They may look up information that they actually know or could easily learn, but are unwilling to make the effort to actually think about it,” said Gordon Pennycook, co-lead author of the study.

“Decades of research has revealed that humans are eager to avoid expending effort when problem-solving and it seems likely that people will increasingly use their smartphones as an extended mind,” noted Nathaniel Barr, the other lead author of the paper.

I think it is great to have so many tech educational resources at our fingertips.  But I too worry about is the next generation. Thinking about things, focusing, contemplating, and making decisions are a crucial part of a young person’s life – as is imagination.

We’ve also done a lot of research on children, Internet safety and the mobile world. AVG Digital Diaries research findings last year showed 42% of the parents polled by AVG said that they are concerned that their child spends too much time on devices, and a similar number (43%) said they were worried their child didn’t spend enough time outside.

So what does this all add up to, in the big picture?

If you have kids, it’s important to take control and limit use of smartphones by setting up guidelines.  At AVG, we offer parental controls to limit and guide smartphone usage through our Location Labs products.

After all, even Steve Jobs famously limited how much technology his kids used at home.

Got privacy? Fewer than 10% of Americans feel in control of their data

It’s a tricky tightrope we walk between security and privacy. The newest report by Pew Research shows that Americans value their privacy and, paradoxically, are only too aware that they don’t have it.

The report, released May 20, highlighted what Pew terms “data insecurity.”

  • Nine in ten adults say being in control of who can get information about them and controlling what information is collected about them is important.
  • Only 9% of respondents felt they had a lot of control over how much information was collected about them and how it was used; and just 6% of the Americans surveyed felt that they could depend on the government to keep their data secure.
  • In the neighborhood of seven in ten people were not confident their activities and records recorded by online advertisers, social media sites and search engines would remain private and secure.

“The majority of Americans believe it is important – often very important – that they be able to maintain privacy and confidentiality in commonplace activities of their lives. Most strikingly, these views are especially pronounced when it comes to knowing what information about them is being collected and who is doing the collecting.”

We at AVG know this well. Pews report mirrors the attitudes that have shown up in our own research and studies conducted with the Mobile Economic Forum.  In our 2014 survey with MEF, we found that 72% of mobile consumers are not happy sharing personal data such as location or contact details when using an app, and one-third (34%) say trust prevents them from buying more goods and services using their mobile device.

The good news is that it looks like people are increasingly aware of their digital footprint and taking action.  For example, according to the Pew survey, 59% cleared their cookies or browser history; 47% refused to provide personal information not relevant to a transaction; 25% used a temporary username or email address; and 24% gave inaccurate or misleading information about themselves.

If you’re like those in the majority of the Pew survey and increasingly worry about your privacy, I urge you to take action.

At the very least, you can take advantage of our free AVG PrivacyFix app to help you manage your online profile across multiple social media platforms, and on all your devices, from one simple interface.  This includes adjusting privacy settings, stopping ad targeting, and blocking tracking.

In the meantime, the tide may be turning for privacy. A lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union led to a U.S. federal appeals court ruling in May that found that the NSA’s bulk phone call metadata-gathering program is illegal. (If you’re an insomniac you can read the 97-page ruling here.)

Obviously, we all want a strong national security program, and if rooting out terrorist cells is to have any success, a communications intelligence network is paramount. But there is another equally important imperative represented by the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment protects all Americans against unreasonable searches by the government. It’s a fine balance between the two mandates and goes directly to the Constitution.

The court ruling is a serious matter, and there may be broader implications. Surely, the natural question is then do these consumer rights apply to all digital footprints, including cyberspace?

Stay tuned.