CVE-2014-9245

Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by attempting a product-rename action with an invalid new name and then reading a stack trace, as demonstrated by internal URL information, aka ZEN-15382.

CVE-2014-9247

Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive (1) user account, (2) e-mail address, and (3) role information by visiting the ZenUsers (aka User Manager) page, aka ZEN-15389.

CVE-2014-9248

Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 does not require complex passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack, aka ZEN-15406.

CVE-2014-9249

The default configuration of Zenoss Core before 5 allows remote attackers to read or modify database information by connecting to unspecified open ports, aka ZEN-15408.

CVE-2014-9250

Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for the authentication cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain credential information via script access to this cookie, aka ZEN-10418.

CVE-2014-9251

Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 uses a weak algorithm to hash passwords, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext values via a brute-force attack on hash values in the database, aka ZEN-15413.

CVE-2014-9252

Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 stores cleartext passwords in the session database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by reading database entries, aka ZEN-15416.

CVE-2014-9385

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger arbitrary code execution via a ZenPack upload, aka ZEN-15388.

CVE-2014-9386

Zenoss Core before 4.2.5 SP161 sets an infinite lifetime for the session ID cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack sessions by leveraging an unattended workstation, aka ZEN-12691.

Defense in depth — the Microsoft way (part 23): two quotes or not to quote…

Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Dec 15

Hi @ll,

some Windows commands/programs fail when (one of) their
command line argument(s) is/are enclosed in quotes; for
example:

%SystemRoot%System32FontView.Exe “<pathname>.TTF”
%SystemRoot%System32FONTVIEW.Exe /P “<filename>.TTF”
%SystemRoot%System32RunDLL32.Exe %SystemRoot%System32SetupAPI.Dll,InstallHinfSection <section> <flags>
“<pathname>.INF”

The failure messages shown…